The
concept of a free society is not difficult to grasp. For me, it is
nowhere more clearly spelled out than in John Stewart Mill's book 'On
Liberty'. Although a nineteenth century work, its fundamental
principle is still sound. It is this: everyone should be allowed to
do what they want as long as it affects no-one but themselves; when
one person's words or actions begin to impinge upon others, we should
draw the line at significant harm.
For
Mill the line is crossed when the exercise of one person's freedom
poses a direct threat to someone else. He has no concern when someone
in a rational debate denounces profiteering by corn merchants. He
would not allow the same words to be spoken by a rabble rouser
whipping up a mob outside a corn merchant's house.
Today
in Britain, freedom of speech is under threat from both reactionary
and populist forces. Intolerance of dissent shows itself in
unwillingness to listen to rational argument and the shouting down of
contrary views. It shows itself in a determination to impose a
viewpoint by compulsion upon those who cannot be persuaded by reason,
or upon those with whom persuasion has not even been attempted.
It shows itself in declarations that certain topics may not be
discussed at all or that perceived dissenters must be punished
unheard.
When
we restrict freedom of speech we take a big step down the road to
totalitarianism and its associated social stagnation and intellectual
decay. We need to think more carefully before we permit steps in such
a backward direction, however seemingly well motivated.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Would you like to comment on this post?